2020-2 made me nervous at first, but it does not appear to even have opponents? It looks like it's redundant with existing laws and exists to put pressure on police to take search/seizure laws more seriously.
If 2020-2 is rejected, it will still be illegal for a cop to force you to unlock your phone at gunpoint, but they'll be able to credibly claim that the will of the public is on their side, even if the law isn't.
Took me a while to figure out how I felt about 2020-1, because it doesn't really provide a context. Proponents speak in empty sentences about how nice parks are, but opponents claim that:
1. It's a shift from buying new land to conserve to only maintaining existing parkland, and
2. It attempts to tie park maintenance budgeting to the mining of fossil fuels.
I added a hit counter to my website, so now you'll know how many other people have viewed my website! https://matt.istheguy.com/
@Simon When you're doing garden stuff, how often do you come across epazote?
Oh and for those who I haven't already told who may be wondering why istheguy email stopped working, it's a related problem, but it won't be anymore because mail is now running on its own separate server. I'm told it takes gmail 5 days to start trusting a new mailserver, so, if you use gmail, that clock is running.
We accept that people overeat due to an easily imagined instinct to always eat as much as possible, because overladen fruit trees didn't show up often. What changed wasn't us, but rather an abundance of sugars and fats.
I've been thinking about this, but applied to decency, rather than thinness. If we used to be pretty decent, if we used to be xeno-curious/friendly instead of xenophobic, what changed?
What normally good/friendly instinct, or set of instincts, got hijacked?
is the guy
A social network for you (if you are the guy)