Took me a while to figure out how I felt about 2020-1, because it doesn't really provide a context. Proponents speak in empty sentences about how nice parks are, but opponents claim that:
1. It's a shift from buying new land to conserve to only maintaining existing parkland, and
2. It attempts to tie park maintenance budgeting to the mining of fossil fuels.
2020-2 made me nervous at first, but it does not appear to even have opponents? It looks like it's redundant with existing laws and exists to put pressure on police to take search/seizure laws more seriously.
If 2020-2 is rejected, it will still be illegal for a cop to force you to unlock your phone at gunpoint, but they'll be able to credibly claim that the will of the public is on their side, even if the law isn't.
Proposal C looks like the affordable housing initiative that this town has been needing for decades. A firm and shouted yes.
A social network for you (if you are the guy)